CSRHub Special Issues
Here is a short description of each of the special issues in our site. By setting your opinion on these issues, you can change and control the ratings on the site. We are always interested in suggestions for additional special issues. We are most interested in areas of interest to a large number of people and that have been well documented with publicly-available sources. However, we will also accept lists of companies from smaller organizations, who want to put them on our site as part of their advocacy work. Please contact us if you are interested in entering your own special issue list.
Companies on this list have a policy of testing the safety of their products on animals. Some may consider this a positive way to ensure that products do not harm humans. Some may consider this a negative, as it causes death an in some cases suffering, for animals. Sources used: Alex's Guide, American Anti-Vivisection Society, Better World Companies, Caring Consumer, Ideal Ratings, IW Financial, Understanding Animal Research.
The companies on this list are involved in Burma, either through subsidiaries located in the country or through trade or other commercial arrangements with it. Some consider interaction with Burma to be negative, as it may support the Burmese regime. Others may consider interaction with Burma as positive, as it may increase interaction with Burmese society and improve the welfare of its people. Sources used: Burma Campaign, Global Union, Ideal Ratings, MSCI ESG Controversies.
Companies on this list are involved in the coal industry either via coal mining, production of coal mining-related equipment, coal-based power production, or engineering services. Sources used: American Coal Council, Bloomberg Market Data, Coal Mining Engineer's List, Power Shares Global Coal, Source Watch Carbon, U.S. Energy Information Administration Coal Producers, Van Eck Global Coal, World Coal Association, Yahoo! Coal.
This company's board of directors has a diverse range of racial, sexual, and cultural backgrounds. Sources used: 2020 Women on Boards, Ideal Ratings, Women and Minorities on Fortune 500 Boards--Alliance for Board Diversity.
Companies on this list drill for natural gas in shale formations (called “shale plays”) using high-volume hydraulic fracturing, or “fracking” (sometimes spelled without the k). This drilling technique is controversial, due to the lack of scientific understanding of the environmental risks (such as water contamination) and human health risks related to the emissions released from the drilling process. These are Oil and Gas Extraction companies, otherwise called the "Exploration & Production" (E&P) business. However, this list also includes companies that provide services related to Exploration & Production in the shale plays, such as gathering, processing transporting and storing natural gas. Sources used: FracFocus, FracFocus.ca, Fracking-Disclosing the Facts, FracTracker, Government of New Brunswick, Marcellus Money, Marcellus Shale Coalition, Mike Benard-founder of Spectra Energy Watch, Ohio Government Department of Natural Resources (ODNR), Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Protection, Western Australia Hydraulic Fracture Stimulation.
Companies on this list have implemented policies that respond to the special needs of gay, lesbian, and transgender employees. These policies may include expanded health and family leave policies, explicit rules regarding workplace discrimination, and management training programs. Sources used: IW Financial.
The companies on this list are involved in Iran, either through subsidiaries located in the country or through trade or other commercial arrangements with it. Sources used: AEI IranTracker, California Iran Contracting Act, Ideal Ratings, Protecting Florida’s Investments Act (PFIA), United Against Nuclear Iran (UANI).